Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, having an 83.7 score against 81.2. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little heavier phone than Galaxy Note 3, but both of them are equally thin. These phones use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, giving some extra features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a much worse pixels count per inch in the display, a much lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little smaller screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments and a bigger camera sensor.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.