Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. The Galaxy Note10 construction is a bit lighter and a little thinner than the LG V50 ThinQ, even when they were released only 4 months apart. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a CPU that is just as good as the LG V50 ThinQ one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note10 and LG V50 ThinQ both have similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, they both have the same aperture, a 12 megapixels back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V50 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.