Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the newer 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, counting with some additional features. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is just a bit thicker and a little heavier than the LG V50 ThinQ.
LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better pixel density. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
LG V50 ThinQ features more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.