Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's general score of 83.7. These devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy S10 and LG V50 ThinQ were released with only 2 months difference, Galaxy S10 is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
The Galaxy S10 and LG V50 ThinQ feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy S10 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S10 counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10's camera is very similar to LG V50 ThinQ's camera, and although the Galaxy S10 has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, they both have a 12 MP resolution back camera, a F1.5 aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG V50 ThinQ features better battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 costs more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.