Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the LG V50 ThinQ, having a global score of 93.6 against 83.7. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is just a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than the LG V50 ThinQ, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a processor that's just as good as the CPU in LG V50 ThinQ, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's camera is very similar to the LG V50 ThinQ one, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.5 aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.