Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is slightly better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. Even though Galaxy S10 Lite and LG V50 ThinQ were released with only 9 months difference, the Galaxy S10 Lite body is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than LG V50 ThinQ. The LG V50 ThinQ and the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite count with very similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more money than LG V50 ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.