Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's global score of 83.7. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a just a little thinner and lighter device than the LG V50 ThinQ, even when they were released only 2 months apart. Galaxy S10e has a processor that's very similar to the processing unit in LG V50 ThinQ, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because it has a bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V50 ThinQ and the Galaxy S10e count with incredibly similar cameras, and although the Galaxy S10e has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, they both have a same resolution back camera, a F1.5 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy S10e, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.