Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy S25, having an 83.7 score against 82.6. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a brighter display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a little bit worse pixels density, a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy S25's battery life is very similar to the battery lifetime in LG V50 ThinQ. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.