Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's general score of 83.7. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is incredibly lighter and thinner than the LG V50 ThinQ. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better looking screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.