Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, having a global score of 83.7 against 78.1. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released about 22 months before. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11.
The LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a much higher display density and a larger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a way lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a bigger aperture. LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.