Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the display. LG V50 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 1% greater battery size. LG V50 ThinQ shoots clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.