Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. Even when LG V50 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro were released only 9 months apart, LG V50 ThinQ is somewhat lighter and thinner. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a quite larger display and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a much better (4K) video definition and a larger aperture for better low-light images.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.