Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting an 88.5 score against 83.7. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing some additional features and enhanced performance. Galaxy Z Flip is a somewhat thinner device than LG V50 ThinQ, but they weight the same.
LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a camera that's very similar to the camera in LG V50 ThinQ, because although the Galaxy Z Flip has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have a 12 megapixels back facing camera, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.