Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting an 85.6 score against 83.7. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design has the same weight than LG V50 ThinQ, but it is thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a processor that's very similar to the LG V50 ThinQ one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger camera aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.