Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than LG V50 ThinQ, with a 92.3 score against 83.7. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body weights the same than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it is somewhat thinner. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a camera that is very similar to LG V50 ThinQ's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate, a camera with a 12 mega pixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.