Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is newer and thinner than the LG V50 ThinQ's, although it is much heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.