Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting a 90.6 score against 83.7. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a extremely newer and notably thinner cellphone than LG V50 ThinQ, although it's also a lot heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a way bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.