Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is slightly better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a extremely heavier but thinner cellphone than the LG V50 ThinQ.
LG V50 ThinQ has an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a little sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse pixels density and a little lower 1968 x 2184px resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 200 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a little longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG V50 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.