Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, having an 83.7 score against 79. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is newer and much thinner than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is also just a bit heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, a way worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way smaller screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.