Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is newer than the Xperia XZs's, although it's heavier and just a little thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM memory and more processing cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a higher pixels density and a larger screen. Sony Xperia XZs has a lot better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a lot better 19 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, higher 960 fps video frame rates and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2900mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.