Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than the LG V50 ThinQ, having an 87.9 score against 83.7. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than the LG V50 ThinQ. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS. LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and LG V50 ThinQ feature very similar processors, both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with improved battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes much better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video definition, a much better resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.