Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora black | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2's 79.3 global score. Despite of the fact that LG V50 ThinQ is older than Xiaomi Poco X2, it's body is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11 version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a lot smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.