Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 general score. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. LG V50 ThinQ's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though it was released only 16 months before.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixels number per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger camera sensor.
LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features superior battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 29 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.