Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora black | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's global score of 83.4. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has Android 11 version. The LG V50 ThinQ body is lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more further than a year before.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's processor is very similar to LG V50 ThinQ's processor, they have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 29% more battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.