Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's global score of 81.1. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Although the LG V50 ThinQ is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.