Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a overall score of 83.7 against 79. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version. LG V50 ThinQ's body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, even though it was released only 11 months before.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a camera with way more MP and a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with greater battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 26% larger battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.