Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a overall score of 83.7 against 76.6. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ's construction is older, a little thicker and a little heavier than ZTE Axon 10s Pro.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V50 ThinQ features a better memory capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro's processing unit is just as good as LG V50 ThinQ's processor, both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The LG V50 ThinQ and the ZTE Axon 10s Pro have extremely similar battery durations. LG V50 ThinQ shoots clearer videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lot tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors and a back camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a larger camera aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.