Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a overall score of 83.7 against 78.1. The LG V50 ThinQ design is just a bit lighter than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it is a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's processor is just as good as the CPU in LG V50 ThinQ, and although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a much more MP camera in the back.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a little better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.