Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is extremely newer than the Google Nexus 6P's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Nexus 6P has just a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel amount in each display inch.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution, a lot higher video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45 percent larger battery size.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.