Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 2, with an 87.6 score against 81.6. LG V60 ThinQ's body is much newer, but somewhat thicker and way heavier than the Google Pixel 2. Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen density.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM. LG V60 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent larger battery size.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.