Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 score. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is extremely newer than the Google Pixel XL's, but it's extremely heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel XL features just a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel density.
LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light situations, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better video quality and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.