Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than the LG V20's 77 general score. The LG V60 ThinQ is a noticeably newer phone than the LG V20, but it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V20 counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel number in each inch in the screen. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a camera with lot more MP, a much better video resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V60 ThinQ features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V60 ThinQ features a superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the LG V20, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.