Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than the LG V30's global score of 79.1. The LG V60 ThinQ body is way newer than LG V30's, but it's much heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
The LG V30 features a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot better video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ features more storage capacity for apps and games than LG V30, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal memory. LG V60 ThinQ has a really longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than LG V30, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.