Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance improvements. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than LG V50 ThinQ.
LG V50 ThinQ and LG V60 ThinQ both count with quite similar processors, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot more MP camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
The LG V50 ThinQ's memory for applications and games is very similar to LG V60 ThinQ's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has improved battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the LG V50 ThinQ, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.