Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer and a lot thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it's also somewhat heavier.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos and a much higher resolution camera. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has improved battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.