Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, with a score of 87.6 against 81.2. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the LG V60 ThinQ body is older, thicker and heavier than Motorola Edge 50.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures much better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much less megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in LG V60 ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.