Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having a overall score of 87.6 against 79.7. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is just a little thinner but somewhat heavier than Moto G Stylus, and both of them were released only a few months apart. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS, so they should offer the same OS features.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a quite larger screen.
Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse video resolution, a tinier sensor and a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has improved battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% more battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.