Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. The LG V60 ThinQ body is newer than Moto Z4's, although it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z4, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bigger display. The LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto Z4 captures better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures and a much worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.