Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2018)'s global score of 84.2. LG V60 ThinQ's body is newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2018). LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) and LG V60 ThinQ feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little greater display density. LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better video resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.