Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a little bit better than LG V60 ThinQ, having a general score of 91.8 against 87.6. Galaxy A71 5G is a just a little thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than LG V60 ThinQ, although both of them were released only 3 months apart. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should offer very similar operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a display that is just as good as LG V60 ThinQ's display, although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little smaller display, a just a little worse pixel density and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. They have a 0.59 inches sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate and a 64 megapixels camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs a little more money than LG V60 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.