Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is a little bit better than LG V60 ThinQ, getting a 90.5 score against 87.6. Galaxy A90 5G is a just a bit lighter and just a little thinner device than LG V60 ThinQ, even when they were released only 7 months apart. Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, while LG V60 ThinQ comes with Android 11 OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a screen that is just as good as the LG V60 ThinQ one, although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little smaller screen and a just a little less pixels per display inch. The LG V60 ThinQ and the Galaxy A90 5G both have extremely similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a back camera with a much lower 48 mega pixels resolution, a lot worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs in poorly lited environments and a tinier back camera sensor.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.