Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy M30s's overall score of 83.3. LG V60 ThinQ is a somewhat heavier device than the Galaxy M30s, but both of them have the same thickness. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a display that's just as good as the LG V60 ThinQ one, because although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M30s features longer battery performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Galaxy M30s captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, a way less mega-pixels camera in the back, a tinier camera aperture and a lot lower (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.