Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M31's 86.5 score. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS. The LG V60 ThinQ design has the same thickness than the Galaxy M31, but it is heavier. LG V60 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy M31 shoots better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same size aperture, a same size sensor and a 64 mega-pixels camera. Galaxy M31 features better battery duration than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.