Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ, getting an 88 score against 87.6. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should count with the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy M31s's construction is a bit thicker but a little bit lighter than LG V60 ThinQ, and both of them were only released 5 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy M31s and LG V60 ThinQ count with quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy M31s has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M31s captures much better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a 0.59 inches sensor, the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and a same resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features better battery lifetime than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.