Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, with a overall score of 87.6 against 87.1. The LG V60 ThinQ is a just a bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note9, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy Note9's CPU is just as good as the CPU in LG V60 ThinQ, and although the Galaxy Note9 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note9 features a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.