Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, getting an 87.6 score against 79.3. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it offers a couple nice extra features and better performance. LG V60 ThinQ's design is incredibly newer, but a lot heavier and way thicker than Galaxy S6 edge+.
LG V60 ThinQ has a superior processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a much better video quality, a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera with a much better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V60 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.