Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than Xperia XZ1's overall score of 78.3. The LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Xperia XZ1, but it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 has a bit more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity in each display inch. Xperia XZ1 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a way tinier back camera sensor, a camera with a much lower resolution, a much lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V60 ThinQ has a really longer battery life than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.