Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 87.6 against 77.8. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is a lot older and notably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter. These phones use Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a larger screen, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a quite greater pixel density. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels resolution and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.