Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with an 87.6 score against 85.5. The LG V60 ThinQ is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but both are equally thin. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and LG V60 ThinQ count with really similar processors, they have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ features longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.