Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than Galaxy S23 Ultra, getting a score of 87.1 against 81.5. LG Velvet counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG Velvet counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a quite lower screen pixel density and a lot lower 1080 x 2460 resolution, they both have a screen with the same size.
Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, because it has a back camera with a way better 200 megapixels resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations. LG Velvet features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.